Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 02:26

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
U.S. blasts Hamas response to Gaza ceasefire plan: ‘Totally unacceptable’ - The Washington Post
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Lawyers could face ‘severe’ penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns - TechCrunch
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Aryna Sabalenka Releases Statement Amid Backlash Over Coco Gauff Comments - Sports Illustrated
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Have you ever witnessed a remote beach show where hundreds of turtles crawling to the water?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Boeing Stock, Up 64% From April Low, Upgraded To Buy As Trump Game Piece - Investor's Business Daily
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Mario Kart World dev comments on why non-Mario characters aren’t included - Nintendo Everything
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.